People v. Hawthorne

600 N.E.2d 231, 80 N.Y.2d 873, 587 N.Y.S.2d 600, 1992 N.Y. LEXIS 1614

• Court: New York Court of Appeals
• Decided: July 7, 1992
• Status: Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The Appellate Division order should be modified by remitting to Supreme Court, Queens County, for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum and, as so modified, affirmed.

Defendant — pointing to the fact that the prosecutor peremptorily challenged four of the six African-American members of the venire — contends that he has made a prima facie showing that the prosecution exercised its peremptory challenges in a racially discriminatory manner, and that the burden therefore shifted to the prosecution to come forward with racially neutral reasons for the strikes (see, Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79, 96; People v Bolling, 79 NY2d 317). We agree. However, because the prosecutor was not asked to provide a racially neutral reason for one of the challenged jurors in question, we remit the case to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a hearing to afford the People an opportunity to provide a racially neutral reason for the exercise of that strike. Should satisfactory explanation be provided by the People, the judgment of conviction should be amended to show that result. Otherwise, the judgment of conviction should be vacated and a new trial ordered.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order modified in accordance with the memorandum herein and, as so modified, affirmed.