People v. Hatchett

2021 NY Slip Op 04282

• Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
• Decided: July 8, 2021
• Docket: Ind No. 2178/17 Appeal No. 14182 Case No. 2019-1339
• Status: Published

Opinion

People v Hatchett (2021 NY Slip Op 04282)

People v Hatchett

2021 NY Slip Op 04282

Decided on July 08, 2021

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided and Entered: July 08, 2021
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Webber, Singh, Kennedy, JJ.

Ind No. 2178/17 Appeal No. 14182 Case No. 2019-1339

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Jermaine Hatchett, Defendant-Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Barbara Zolot of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Jared Wolkowitz of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Laura A. Ward, J.), rendered September 25, 2018, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second and third degrees, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of nine years, held in abeyance, and the matter remanded to Supreme Court for determination, based upon the evidence presented at the suppression hearing, of the issues raised at the hearing but not determined therein.

The motion to suppress should not have been denied on a ground not raised by the People. It is unclear to what extent the suppression court considered and credited the People's argument regarding probable cause or whether the search was outside of the Fourth Amendment's purview under the circumstances. Accordingly, we hold the appeal in abeyance and remand for determination, based on the hearing minutes, of the issues raised at the hearing, but not decided (see People v Garcia, 20 NY3d 317, 324 [2012]).

At this stage of the appeal, we do not address defendant's remaining contentions.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: July 8, 2021