People v. Harris

309 A.D.2d 512, 765 N.Y.S.2d 248, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9997
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 285 A.D.2d 980

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (John Bradley, J.), rendered June 19, 2002, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4V2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility, including the weight to be given to inconsistencies in testimony, were properly considered by the jury and there is no basis for disturbing its determinations.

The court’s Sandoval ruling balanced the appropriate factors and was a proper exercise of discretion (see People v Hayes, 97 NY2d 203 [2002]; People v Walker, 83 NY2d 455, 458-459 [1994]; People v Pavao, 59 NY2d 282, 292 [1983]). Concur— Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Saxe and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Harris, 309 A.D.2d 512, 765 N.Y.S.2d 248, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9997 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

309 A.D.2d 512 (People v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hayes
764 N.E.2d 963 (New York Court of Appeals, 2002)
People v. Walker
633 N.E.2d 472 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
People v. Pavao
451 N.E.2d 216 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)