People v. Harris

152 A.D.2d 953, 544 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9836
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Harris. Read the opinion of the Court — 132 A.D.2d 940

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Ford, 66 NY2d 428, 437), we conclude that it provided a valid line of reasoning to sustain defendant’s conviction of robbery in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and grand larceny in the third degree. Further, we find no error in the court’s refusal to charge attempted robbery in the first degree and attempted grand larceny in the third degree as lesser included offenses. There was no reasonable view of the evidence that would have supported a finding that defendant committed the lesser offense, but not the greater (see, People v Glover, 57 NY2d 61, 64).

We have reviewed defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. (Appeal from judgment of [954]*954Supreme Court, Monroe County, Doyle, J. — robbery, first degree, and other charges.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Balio and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Harris, 152 A.D.2d 953, 544 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9836 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

152 A.D.2d 953 (People v. Harris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Glover
439 N.E.2d 376 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Ford
488 N.E.2d 458 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)