People v. Harrell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Harrell

308 A.D.2d 608, 764 N.Y.S.2d 217, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9298

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 11, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 308 A.D.2d 608 (People v. Harrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Harrell, 308 A.D.2d 608, 764 N.Y.S.2d 217, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9298 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered May 30, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree in satisfaction of two multicount indictments and pending misdemeanor charges. Defendant was sentenced in accordance with the negotiated plea agreement to a prison term of five years to life. Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application to be relieved of his assignment is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Smith, J.), rendered May 30, 2002, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree in satisfaction of two multicount indictments and pending misdemeanor charges. Defendant was sentenced in accordance with the negotiated plea agreement to a prison term of five years to life. Defense counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment as counsel for defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record and defense counsel’s brief, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and defense counsel’s application to be relieved of his assignment is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Mercure, J.P., Crew III, Peters, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

308 A.D.2d 608, 764 N.Y.S.2d 217, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-harrell-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack