People v. Harper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Harper

119 A.D.2d 587, 500 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55519

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 7, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 119 A.D.2d 587 (People v. Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Harper, 119 A.D.2d 587, 500 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55519 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), rendered January 10, 1984, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s contention that his arrest was made in violation of US Constitution 4th Amendment. Since the defendant’s wife consented to the police entry into their home, the arrest therein was proper (see, United States v Kornblau, 586 F Supp 614; cf. Payton v New York, 445 US 573, 583.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either not preserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Feldman, J.), rendered January 10, 1984, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

We reject the defendant’s contention that his arrest was made in violation of US Constitution 4th Amendment. Since the defendant’s wife consented to the police entry into their home, the arrest therein was proper (see, United States v Kornblau, 586 F Supp 614; cf. Payton v New York, 445 US 573, 583.

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either not preserved for appellate review or without merit. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 A.D.2d 587, 500 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 55519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-harper-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack