People v. Harper

269 Cal. App. 2d 221, 74 Cal. Rptr. 859, 1969 Cal. App. LEXIS 1637
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJanuary 28, 1969
DocketCrim. 14485
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 269 Cal. App. 2d 221 (People v. Harper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Harper, 269 Cal. App. 2d 221, 74 Cal. Rptr. 859, 1969 Cal. App. LEXIS 1637 (Cal. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinions

STEPHENS, Acting P. J.

By information, defendant was charged with a violation of section 459 of the Penal Code (burglary). Defendant pleaded not guilty, waived jury trial, and submitted the cause on the preliminary hearing transcript plus his testimony. The defendant was found not guilty of the charge of burglary, but guilty of “a lesser and necessarily included offense in Section 459 Penal Code,” criminal trespass, in violation of section 602, subdivision (l) of the Penal Code.1 Appeal is from the judgment.

We need not state the facts since reversal is required for error of law, the crime of criminal trespass. (§ 692, subd. (1), Pen. Code)2 not being a lesser included offense3 in a charge of violation of section 459 of the Penal Code.4

Criminal trespass requires the occupation of real property or structures, as well as the entry. To occupy means a non-transient, continuous type of possession. (People v. Wilkinson (App. Dept., Superior Court) 248 Cal.App.2d Supp. 906, 910 [56 Cal.Rptr. 261].) It needs no authority to convince us that a burglar has no intention except the most transient of trespasses. There is a further element in Penal Code section [223]*223602, subdivision (Z) which cannot be an element of Penal Code section 459, and that is that criminal trespass may be upon vacant property, while burglary is limited to the entry of a structure or other specified enclosure.5

The judgment is reversed.

Reppy, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Marlon C. CA2/4
California Court of Appeal, 2013
People v. Birks
960 P.2d 1073 (California Supreme Court, 1998)
People v. Epps
34 Cal. App. 3d 146 (California Court of Appeal, 1973)
People v. Harper
269 Cal. App. 2d 221 (California Court of Appeal, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 Cal. App. 2d 221, 74 Cal. Rptr. 859, 1969 Cal. App. LEXIS 1637, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-harper-calctapp-1969.