People v. Hargroves
This text of 296 A.D.2d 582 (People v. Hargroves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rotker, J.), rendered July 26, 2000, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.
Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony is granted, the indictment is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50 (see People v Hargroves, 296 AD2d 581 [decided herewith]). Florio, J.P., Friedmann, H. Miller and Crane, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
296 A.D.2d 582, 745 N.Y.S.2d 724, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hargroves-nyappdiv-2002.