People v. Hargroves

265 A.D.2d 502, 696 N.Y.S.2d 708, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10418
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hargroves. Read the opinion of the Court — 296 A.D.2d 581

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Erlbaum, J.), rendered July 28, 1998, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to sustain his conviction is unpreserved for appelreview (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Angus, 192 AD2d 665; People v Fields, 188 AD2d 612). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hargroves, 265 A.D.2d 502, 696 N.Y.S.2d 708, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10418 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

265 A.D.2d 502 (People v. Hargroves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Fields
188 A.D.2d 612 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
People v. Angus
192 A.D.2d 665 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)