People v. Hargrove

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hargrove

138 A.D.2d 742, 526 N.Y.S.2d 925, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3329

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 28, 1988

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 138 A.D.2d 742 (People v. Hargrove) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hargrove, 138 A.D.2d 742, 526 N.Y.S.2d 925, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3329 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Application by the defendant for a writ of error of coram nobis, to vacate a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Balbach, J.), rendered April 26, 1979, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.

Ordered that the application is denied.

A review of the record on appeal, the defendant’s pro se brief, and the brief submitted by counsel on the defendant’s direct appeal to this court, demonstrates that the defendant’s appellate counsel capably presented nonfrivolous issues for this court’s consideration. The defendant’s appellate counsel clearly satisfied the constitutional standard of effective assistance of appellate counsel set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Jones v Barnes (463 US 745). Accordingly, the defendant’s application must be denied. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Brown and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Application by the defendant for a writ of error of coram nobis, to vacate a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Balbach, J.), rendered April 26, 1979, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel.

Ordered that the application is denied.

A review of the record on appeal, the defendant’s pro se brief, and the brief submitted by counsel on the defendant’s direct appeal to this court, demonstrates that the defendant’s appellate counsel capably presented nonfrivolous issues for this court’s consideration. The defendant’s appellate counsel clearly satisfied the constitutional standard of effective assistance of appellate counsel set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Jones v Barnes (463 US 745). Accordingly, the defendant’s application must be denied. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Brown and Sullivan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 A.D.2d 742, 526 N.Y.S.2d 925, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hargrove-nyappdiv-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack