People v. Hancock

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hancock

54 A.D.3d 773, 862 N.Y.S.2d 911

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 9, 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered September 27, 2005, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial is without merit (see People v Cousart, 58 NY2d 62, 66 [1982]; People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442, 445 [1975]). Accordingly, the County Court correctly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to dismiss the indictment based on a purported constitutional speedy trial violation. Mastro, J.E, Florio, Dickerson and Belen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered September 27, 2005, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was denied his constitutional right to a speedy trial is without merit (see People v Cousart, 58 NY2d 62, 66 [1982]; People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442, 445 [1975]). Accordingly, the County Court correctly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to dismiss the indictment based on a purported constitutional speedy trial violation. Mastro, J.E, Florio, Dickerson and Belen, JJ., concur.

People v. Hancock, 54 A.D.3d 773, 862 N.Y.S.2d 911 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

54 A.D.3d 773 (People v. Hancock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related