People v. Hamilton
297 A.D.2d 289, 745 N.Y.2d 919, 745 N.Y.S.2d 919, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7805
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 5, 2002·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
[290]*290The County Court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence without a hearing, since the motion did not contain sworn allegations of fact supporting the defendant’s claim that he was arrested without probable cause (see CPL 710.60; People v Mendoza, 82 NY2d 415; People v Alers, 234 AD2d 310). Ritter, J.P., Feuerstein, Adams and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Hamilton, 297 A.D.2d 289, 745 N.Y.2d 919, 745 N.Y.S.2d 919, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7805 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).
297 A.D.2d 289 (People v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Struss
11 A.D.3d 715 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)