People v. Hall

176 A.D.2d 988, 574 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13188
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Hall. Read the opinion of the Court — 158 A.D.2d 69

Opinion

— Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Monserrate, J.), rendered May 21, 1990 in Broome County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

The only contention raised by defendant on this appeal is that his sentence was harsh and excessive. However, the prison sentence he received as a second felony offender of AVi to 9 years was the most lenient sentence authorized (see, Penal Law § 70.06 [3] [b]; [4] [b]) and was in accordance with the plea-bargain agreement. Furthermore, another felony count was dropped as a result of the plea agreement. Under these circumstances, we find no abuse of discretion by Supreme Court in imposing sentence (see, People v Mackey, 136 [989]*989AD2d 780, lv denied 71 NY2d 899; People v Gray, 131 AD2d 590).

Mahoney, P. J., Weiss, Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hall, 176 A.D.2d 988, 574 N.Y.S.2d 1018, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13188 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

176 A.D.2d 988 (People v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gray
131 A.D.2d 590 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
People v. Mackey
136 A.D.2d 780 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)