People v. Hale

136 A.D. 664, 121 N.Y.S. 473, 1910 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 107
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 4, 1910·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Hirschberg, P. J.:

The defendant was charged with a violation of the provisions of section 1188 of the amended charter of the city of New York (Laws of 1901, chap. 466), in refusing permission to a sanitary inspector of the department of health to enter and examine the premises of the defendant' as to their sanitary condition. The papers on appeal state that the demurrer was overruled without, written order, and that the appeal is taken from the oral order so overruling the demurrer. Aside from the question of the validity of the act which the defendant is charged with transgressing,- and which is not considered, no authority for the practice adopted by the appellant is known to the court and none is furnished in the brief. The appeal should, therefore, be dismissed, but without costs. . - -

Jeers, Bure, Thomas and Garb, JJ., concurred.

.Appeal dismissed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Hale, 136 A.D. 664, 121 N.Y.S. 473, 1910 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 107 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

136 A.D. 664 (People v. Hale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Oliver
38 Misc. 2d 320 (New York County Courts, 1963)
People v. Rudnick
255 A.D. 813 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1938)
People v. Hale
122 N.Y.S. 1141 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)