People v. Haist

16 Mich. App. 671
CourtMichigan Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 28, 1969
DocketDocket No. 4,280
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 Mich. App. 671 (People v. Haist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Haist, 16 Mich. App. 671 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant pled guilty to breaking and entering with intent to commit larceny, CL [672]*6721948, § 750.110 as amended by PA 1964, No 133 (Stat Ann 1968 Cum Snpp § 28.305), and on appeal contends that the manner in which the lower court accepted his plea effectively denied him his right to counsel. The record discloses that the court did not advise defendant of his constitutional right to court-appointed counsel, either before pleading or at his sentencing.’ GCR 1963, 785.3(1). Without recorded evidence of defendant’s knowledge of his right to appointed counsel, we cannot conclude he knowingly waived it.

Conviction reversed and remanded for a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Haist
168 N.W.2d 630 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 Mich. App. 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-haist-michctapp-1969.