People v. Guzman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Guzman

303 A.D.2d 765, 757 N.Y.S.2d 456, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3445

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 31, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 303 A.D.2d 765 (People v. Guzman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Guzman, 303 A.D.2d 765, 757 N.Y.S.2d 456, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3445 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.), rendered August 22, 2001, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is belied by the record (see People v Bristol, 273 AD2d 248, 249 [2000]). The defendant admitted at the plea proceeding that he had an adequate opportunity to speak to his attorney, and that he was satisfied with his legal representation (see People v Harris, 222 AD2d 522, 523 [1995]). Santucci, J.P., Krausman, McGinity, Schmidt and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.), rendered August 22, 2001, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is belied by the record (see People v Bristol, 273 AD2d 248, 249 [2000]). The defendant admitted at the plea proceeding that he had an adequate opportunity to speak to his attorney, and that he was satisfied with his legal representation (see People v Harris, 222 AD2d 522, 523 [1995]). Santucci, J.P., Krausman, McGinity, Schmidt and Crane, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 A.D.2d 765, 757 N.Y.S.2d 456, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3445, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-guzman-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack