People v. Gurley

369 N.E.2d 1183, 42 N.Y.2d 1086, 399 N.Y.S.2d 650, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2420
New York Court of Appeals·Decided October 18, 1977·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division is affirmed.

[1087]*1087Defendant’s present claim of error regarding the trial court’s charge and that certain evidence was improperly received in evidence is unavailing. It is manifest that no alleged errors were preserved for our review by either exception or proper objection. His failure to take appropriate exception or to request further clarification at a time "when the court had an opportunity of effectively changing” any instruction preserved no question of law in connection therewith reviewable by this court (CPL 470.05, subd 2; People v Robinson, 36 NY2d 224, 228-229; People v Kibbe, 35 NY2d 407, 413-414). We have examined defendant’s other arguments which we find to be without merit.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gurley, 369 N.E.2d 1183, 42 N.Y.2d 1086, 399 N.Y.S.2d 650, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2420 (N.Y. 1977).

369 N.E.2d 1183 (People v. Gurley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Bernardo
83 A.D.2d 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
People v. Thomas
407 N.E.2d 430 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Cicchetti
44 N.Y. 803 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
People v. Gurley
373 N.E.2d 287 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)