People v. Gumbs

8 A.D.3d 677, 778 N.Y.S.2d 892, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9121
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Gumbs. Read the opinion of the Court — 304 A.D.2d 365

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Mullin, J.), rendered May 18, 2001, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of robbery in the first degree is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245 [1989]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The defendant’s remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review, without merit, or do not require reversal. H. Miller, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gumbs, 8 A.D.3d 677, 778 N.Y.S.2d 892, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9121 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

8 A.D.3d 677 (People v. Gumbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gray
652 N.E.2d 919 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Udzinski
146 A.D.2d 245 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)