People v. Griffith

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Griffith. Read the opinion of the Court — 212 Ill. 2d 57
Illinois Supreme Court·Decided June 17, 2004·No. 95218 Rel·Published

Opinion

Docket No. 95218–Agenda 2–November 2003.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellee,  v. EVAN GRIFFITH, Appellant.

Opinion filed June 17, 2004.

PER CURIAM :

In this case, one Justice of this Court has recused himself and the remaining members of the Court are divided so that it is not possible to secure the constitutionally required concurrence of four judges for a decision (see Ill. Const. 1970, art. VI, §3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. The effect of this dismissal is the same as an affirmance by an equally divided court of the decision under review but is of no precedential value. See Perlman v. First National Bank , 60 Ill. 2d 529, 530 (1975).

FITZGERALD, J., took no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Griffith, (Ill. 2004).

People v. Griffith (People v. Griffith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perlman v. First Nat'l Bank of Chicago
331 N.E.2d 65 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1975)