People v. Griffith
816 N.E.2d 353, 212 Ill. 2d 57, 287 Ill. Dec. 591, 2004 Ill. LEXIS 988
Opinion
In this case, one Justice of this Court has recused himself and the remaining members of the Court are divided so that it is not possible to secure the constitutionally required concurrence of four judges for a decision (see Ill. Const. 1970, art. VI, § 3). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. The effect of this dismissal is the same as an affirmance by an equally divided court of the decision under review but is of no precedential value. See Perlman v. First National Bank, 60 Ill. 2d 529, 530 (1975).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Griffith, 816 N.E.2d 353, 212 Ill. 2d 57, 287 Ill. Dec. 591, 2004 Ill. LEXIS 988 (Ill. 2004).
816 N.E.2d 353 (People v. Griffith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Ins. Co.
2011 IL App (1st) 093240 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2011)
Crane v. Admiral Insurance Company
2011 IL App (1st) 93240 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2011)
Sierra Club v. ILLINOIS POLLUTION CONTROL
936 N.E.2d 670 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2010)
Sierra Club v. Illinois Pollution Control Board
Appellate Court of Illinois, 2010
People v. Stechly
870 N.E.2d 333 (Illinois Supreme Court, 2007)
Vill v. Industrial Commission
842 N.E.2d 674 (Illinois Supreme Court, 2005)
STATE EX REL. NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. v. Elkhart Superior Court, Room One
556 N.E.2d 326 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1990)
State v. Porter Circuit Court
486 N.E.2d 529 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1985)