People v. Griffin

110 A.D.2d 850, 488 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48757
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 22, 1985·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Defendant forfeited his right to challenge the adverse Sandoval ruling by his plea of guilty (People v Claudio, 64 NY2d 858; People v Zangrillo, 105 AD2d 822; People v Gilliam, 65 AD2d 533). Were we to reach the merits of defendant’s claim, we would affirm the trial court’s ruling as proper and not an abuse of discretion (see, People v Jackson, 108 AD2d 757; People v Sterling, 95 AD2d 927; People v Hicks, 88 AD2d 519).

We have considered defendant’s further contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel and conclude that the record does not support the claim (see, People v Morris, 100 AD2d 630, affd 64 NY2d 803; People v Bonk, 83 AD2d 695). Mollen, P. J., Titone, Thompson and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Griffin, 110 A.D.2d 850, 488 N.Y.S.2d 625, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48757 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

110 A.D.2d 850 (People v. Griffin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Martin
121 A.D.2d 474 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Winchenbaugh
120 A.D.2d 811 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
People v. Thompson
117 A.D.2d 637 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)