People v. Griffin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Griffin

96 A.D.2d 720, 465 N.Y.S.2d 89, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19287

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 11, 1983·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: In affirming we hold that proof of penetration is not required for conviction of sodomy (see Penal Law, § 130.00, subd 2; People v Griffith, 80 AD2d 590). In any event, there is sufficient evidence in the record from which the jury could find that penetration had occurred. On review of the record we find no support for defendant’s contention that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel at trial. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Boomer, J. — sodomy, first degree.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: In affirming we hold that proof of penetration is not required for conviction of sodomy (see Penal Law, § 130.00, subd 2; People v Griffith, 80 AD2d 590). In any event, there is sufficient evidence in the record from which the jury could find that penetration had occurred. On review of the record we find no support for defendant’s contention that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel at trial. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Boomer, J. — sodomy, first degree.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Denman, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

People v. Griffin, 96 A.D.2d 720, 465 N.Y.S.2d 89, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19287 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

96 A.D.2d 720 (People v. Griffin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related