People v. Greenfeld

2025 NY Slip Op 00110
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 8, 2025
Docket2022-09013
StatusPublished

This text of 2025 NY Slip Op 00110 (People v. Greenfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Greenfeld, 2025 NY Slip Op 00110 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

People v Greenfeld (2025 NY Slip Op 00110)
People v Greenfeld
2025 NY Slip Op 00110
Decided on January 8, 2025
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on January 8, 2025 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
LARA J. GENOVESI, J.P.
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
HELEN VOUTSINAS
DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ.

2022-09013
2022-09014
2022-09015
2022-09016
(Ind. No. 70131/20; S.C.I. Nos. 70132/20, 70133/20, 70134/20)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Aharon Greenfeld, appellant.


James D. Licata, New City, NY (Lois Cappelletti of counsel), for appellant, and appellant pro se.

Thomas E. Walsh II, District Attorney, New City, NY (Kerianne Morrissey of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant from four judgments of the County Court, Rockland County (Larry J. Schwartz, J.), all rendered May 17, 2022, convicting him of burglary in the third degree under Indictment No. 70131/20, burglary in the third degree and petit larceny under Superior Court Information No. 70132/20, burglary in the third degree and petit larceny under Superior Court Information No. 70133/20, and burglary in the third degree and petit larceny under Superior Court Information No. 70134/20, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 254, 257; People v Gue, 214 AD3d 1002, 1002). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contentions that the sentences imposed were excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 255-256).

GENOVESI, J.P., BRATHWAITE NELSON, VOUTSINAS and GOLIA, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Darrell M. Joseph

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Johnson
214 A.D.3d 1002 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2025 NY Slip Op 00110, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-greenfeld-nyappdiv-2025.