People v. Green

229 A.D.2d 548, 644 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7897
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Green. Read the opinion of the Court — 200 A.D.2d 687

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered May 19, 1995, convicting him of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to make a motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. Thus, he failed to preserve for appellate review his contentions that the defense of agency should have been presented to the Grand Jury and that his plea allocution was insufficient (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636). Since the defendant received the promised sentence, he has no basis to [549]*549complain that his sentence is excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). The defendant’s contention that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel is without merit. Bracken, J. P., Miller, Joy, Hart and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Green, 229 A.D.2d 548, 644 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

229 A.D.2d 548 (People v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pellegrino
454 N.E.2d 938 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)