People v. Green

205 A.D.2d 800, 614 N.Y.S.2d 925
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 27, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (King, J.), rendered November 1, 1991, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (three counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The People were not required to serve the defendant with a notice pursuant to CPL 710.30. Neither Investigator Joseph nor Trooper Hilts had participated in a pretrial identification procedure within the meaning of that statute (see, People v Rodriguez, 79 NY2d 445, 450; People v Gissendanner, 48 NY2d 543, 552; People v McClane, 149 AD2d 536; People v Crespo, 111 AD2d 251).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive and should not be disturbed (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Green, 205 A.D.2d 800, 614 N.Y.S.2d 925 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

205 A.D.2d 800 (People v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Smith
2019 NY Slip Op 5574 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)