People v. Grant

39 A.D.3d 770, 832 N.Y.S.2d 441
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Grant. Read the opinion of the Court — 17 A.D.3d 695

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (McKay, J.), rendered July 28, 2003, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the defense counsel’s failure to move to dismiss the indictment on the ground that there was an unreasonable delay in sentencing (see CPL 380.30 [1]; People v Drake, 61 NY2d 359 [1984]) did not deprive him of meaningful representation (see US Const Sixth Amend; NY Const, art I, § 6; Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668 [1984]; People v Caban, 5 NY3d 143 [2005]; People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708 [1998]). Skelos, J.P., Angiolillo, Carni and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Grant, 39 A.D.3d 770, 832 N.Y.S.2d 441 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

39 A.D.3d 770 (People v. Grant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Strickland v. Washington
466 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1984)
People v. Benevento
697 N.E.2d 584 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
People v. Caban
833 N.E.2d 213 (New York Court of Appeals, 2005)
People v. Drake
462 N.E.2d 376 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)