People v. Grant

17 A.D.3d 695, 792 N.Y.S.2d 921
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 25, 2005·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defen[696]*696dant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Molea, J.), rendered September 5, 2003, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support convictions of depraved indifference murder (see Penal Law § 125.25 [2]; People v Payne, 3 NY3d 266 [2004]) and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (see Penal Law § 265.02 [1]), is not preserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]; People v Gibbons, 15 AD3d 196 [2005]; People v Gutierrez, 15 AD3d 502 [2005]), and we decline to reach the issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.15 [3] [c]; [6] [a]; People v Gutierrez, supra).

Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]; People v Martin, 8 AD3d 883 [2004]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Krausman, Crane and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Grant, 17 A.D.3d 695, 792 N.Y.S.2d 921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

17 A.D.3d 695 (People v. Grant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Garrison
39 A.D.3d 1138 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Fore
33 A.D.3d 932 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Grant
30 A.D.3d 613 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)