People v. Grant

1 A.D.2d 377, 766 N.Y.S.2d 869
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Grant. Read the opinion of the Court — 294 A.D.2d 671

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Berry, J.), rendered June 21, 2002, convicting him of rape in the first degree, sexual abuse in the first degree (two counts), unlawful imprisonment in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, sexual misconduct, and endangering the welfare of a child, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record does not support the defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The defendant’s trial counsel rendered meaningful representation to him at all stages of the proceeding (see People v Henry, 95 NY2d 563 [2000]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146 [1981]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Altman, J.E, Florio, Friedmann and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Grant, 1 A.D.2d 377, 766 N.Y.S.2d 869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

1 A.D.2d 377 (People v. Grant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Henry
744 N.E.2d 112 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)