People v. Grant

187 A.D.2d 997, 593 N.Y.S.2d 473, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14022
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 18, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was not denied effective assistance of counsel by his trial attorney’s unsuccessful suppression motion and subsequent cross-examination of police officers concerning the basis for the search warrant (see generally, People v Rivera, 71 NY2d 705, 708-709; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 146-147).

Defendant’s remaining arguments on appeal are unpreserved and we decline to reach them in the interest of justice. (Appeal from Judgment of Onondaga County Court, Cunning[998]*998ham, J. — Burglary, 2nd Degree.) Present — Boomer, J. P., Pine, Lawton, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Grant, 187 A.D.2d 997, 593 N.Y.S.2d 473, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14022 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

187 A.D.2d 997 (People v. Grant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Michael Grant v. Joseph E. McCoy
104 F.3d 353 (Second Circuit, 1996)