People v. Graham

135 A.D.2d 1115, 523 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52975
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Graham. Read the opinion of the Court — 111 A.D.2d 831

Opinion

— Order unanimously reversed on the law, motion denied and indictment reinstated. Memorandum: The court erred in granting defendant’s oral motion to dismiss the indictment. "A motion to dismiss an indictment pursuant to CPL 210.20 must be made in writing and upon reasonable notice to the people” (CPL 210.45 [1]; People v De Rosa, 42 NY2d 872; People v Jack, 117 AD2d 753). Here, the prosecutor did not waive his right to have the motion made on papers, and with notice (cf., People v Lebensfeld, 82 AD2d 925) but, instead, asserted that one of the grounds upon which he opposed the motion was the failure of defendant to make the motion on papers. (Appeal from order of Erie County Court, Monserate, J. — dismiss indictment.) Present— Doerr, J. P., Denman, Boomer, Green and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Graham, 135 A.D.2d 1115, 523 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52975 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

135 A.D.2d 1115 (People v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. De Rosa
366 N.E.2d 868 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
People v. Lebensfeld
82 A.D.2d 925 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
People v. Jack
117 A.D.2d 753 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)