People v. De Rosa
This text of 366 N.E.2d 868 (People v. De Rosa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum. Order of the Appellate Term affirmed.
The issue in this case did not turn on denial of a speedy trial. Had it been so, the failure of defendant to follow the procedure under CPL 210.20, 210.45 would sustain the reversal by the Appellate Term. Nor was the procedure at the trial court appropriate for a dismissal in the furtherance of justice under CPL 170.30 (subd 1, pars [e], [g]) (CPL 170.45). The correct issue was the abrupt refusal of the trial court on calendar call to allow an adjournment until 2:00 p.m. of the day previously set for trial. This, on the conceded facts and inevitable inferences from them, constituted an abuse of discretion as a matter of law (see Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 108, p 459; ch 16).
Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
366 N.E.2d 868, 42 N.Y.2d 872, 397 N.Y.S.2d 780, 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-de-rosa-ny-1977.