People v. Graham

320 N.E.2d 156, 23 Ill. App. 3d 685

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 7, 1974·No. 60139·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

23 Ill. App.3d 685 (1974) 320 N.E.2d 156

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
THEOPHILUS GRAHAM, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 60139.

Illinois Appellate Court First District (1st Division).

October 7, 1974.

*686 James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago, for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State's Attorney, of Chicago, for the People.

Abstract of Decision.

Judgment affirmed, motion allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

23 Ill. App.3d 685 (1974) 320 N.E.2d 156

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
THEOPHILUS GRAHAM, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 60139.

Illinois Appellate Court First District (1st Division).

October 7, 1974.

*686 James J. Doherty, Public Defender, of Chicago, for appellant.

Bernard Carey, State's Attorney, of Chicago, for the People.

Abstract of Decision.

Judgment affirmed, motion allowed.

People v. Graham, 320 N.E.2d 156, 23 Ill. App. 3d 685 (Ill. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

320 N.E.2d 156 (People v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Jennings

541 N.E.2d 155 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1989)

People v. Williams

350 N.E.2d 81 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1976)