People v. Gonzalez

2016 NY Slip Op 7631, 144 A.D.3d 880, 40 N.Y.S.3d 784
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 16, 2016·No. 2007-11625·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Mullings, J.), dated November 26, 2007, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant appeals from his designation as a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C; hereinafter SORA).

The defendant’s contention that he was entitled to a downward departure from his presumptive designation as a level two sex offender is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d 841, 861 n 5 [2014]; People v Johnson, 11 NY3d 416, 422 [2008]; People v Rodriguez, 136 AD3d 880, 881 [2016]). In any event, the defendant failed to identify any mitigating factors that were not adequately taken into account by the SORA guidelines (see People v Gillotti, 23 NY3d at 861; People v Uphael, 140 AD3d 1143, 1145 [2016]; People v Sanchez, 138 AD3d 946, 947 [2016]).

Dillon, J.P., Dickerson, Duffy and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gonzalez, 2016 NY Slip Op 7631, 144 A.D.3d 880, 40 N.Y.S.3d 784 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

2016 NY Slip Op 7631 (People v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Fuentes
2017 NY Slip Op 1576 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)