People v. Gonzalez
113 A.D.3d 792, 978 N.Y.2d 870
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 22, 2014·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
[793]*793Inasmuch as the maximum term of the defendant’s resentence expired during the pendency of this appeal, “any issues which relate to the length of his [re]sentence are academic” (People v Conklin, 46 AD3d 698, 698 [2007]; see People v Reyes, 74 NY2d 837, 838 [1989]). Rivera, J.P., Dickerson, Leventhal and Hall, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Gonzalez, 113 A.D.3d 792, 978 N.Y.2d 870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).
113 A.D.3d 792 (People v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Sofo
159 N.Y.S.3d 718 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
People v. King
2018 NY Slip Op 3547 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Cole
2016 NY Slip Op 7207 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Corbin
141 A.D.3d 730 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
People v. Velez
116 A.D.3d 1077 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)