People v. Gonzalez

245 A.D.2d 205, 665 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13318
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Gonzalez. Read the opinion of the Court — 216 A.D.2d 412

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Phylis Skloot Bamberger, J.), rendered May 25, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of two counts of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 4 to 8 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court appropriately accepted defendant’s guilty plea. There was no need to make further inquiry to ensure that defendant understood the nature of the charge since during the plea allocution, defendant never made a statement that negated “an essential element of the crime” of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666). Rather, defendant clearly acknowledged that he sold drugs on the dates in question. Concur— Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Wallach, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gonzalez, 245 A.D.2d 205, 665 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13318 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

245 A.D.2d 205 (People v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
525 N.E.2d 5 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)