People v. Gonzalez

218 A.D.2d 814, 631 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8971

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Gonzalez. Read the opinion of the Court — 187 A.D.2d 607 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 28, 1995·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the [815]*815defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (George, J.), rendered September 10, 1990, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive and should not be disturbed (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or do not warrant reversal. Copertino, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive and should not be disturbed (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or do not warrant reversal. Copertino, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

People v. Gonzalez, 218 A.D.2d 814, 631 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8971 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

218 A.D.2d 814 (People v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

People v. Suitte

90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Opinion

Related