People v. Gonzalez

191 A.D.2d 292, 595 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2425
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 16, 1993·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Mazur, J.), entered January 8, 1992, which granted defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence, unanimously dismissed, with leave to reinstate within one year of the entry of this order, upon submission of proof of service of appellant’s brief upon defendant.

The record reveals that only trial counsel but not defendant himself, has been served with the People’s appellate brief. Since trial counsel’s responsibility to represent defendant terminated at the conclusion of the proceedings below, and since trial counsel has not been assigned or retained as to this appeal and has made no appearance on defendant’s behalf, no valid service upon defendant has been effected, and the appeal must therefore be dismissed (People v Basilis, 191 AD2d 244).

The unpublished order of this Court entered herein on March 9, 1993 is hereby recalled and vacated. Concur — Ellerin, J. P., Kupferman, Ross and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gonzalez, 191 A.D.2d 292, 595 N.Y.S.2d 947, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2425 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

191 A.D.2d 292 (People v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hernandez
210 A.D.2d 504 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)