People v. Gonzalez

158 A.D.2d 407, 551 N.Y.S.2d 521, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1873
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 22, 1990·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

We are unpersuaded that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or severe. Taking into account, "among other things, the crime charged, the particular circumstances of the individ[408]*408ual before the court and the purpose of a penal sanction”, we perceive no abuse of discretion warranting a reduction in sentence. (People v Farrar, 52 NY2d 302, 305.)

Further, defendant was sentenced in accordance with his plea bargain and within statutory guidelines. "Having received the benefit of his bargain, defendant should be bound by its terms.” (People v Felman, 141 AD2d 889, 890, lv denied 72 NY2d 918.) Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Asch, Ellerin and Wallach, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gonzalez, 158 A.D.2d 407, 551 N.Y.S.2d 521, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1873 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

158 A.D.2d 407 (People v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hale
173 A.D.2d 212 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)