People v. Hale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Hale

171 A.D.2d 1026, 579 N.Y.S.2d 598

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 8, 1991

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 171 A.D.2d 1026 (People v. Hale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Hale, 171 A.D.2d 1026, 579 N.Y.S.2d 598 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court did not err in accepting defendant’s plea to first degree burglary (see, Penal Law § 140.30 [3]). The record establishes that there was a sufficient factual basis for the plea and that there was no reason for the court to inquire about a possible intoxication defense. Defendant’s sentence is not excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J. — Burglary, 1st Degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court did not err in accepting defendant’s plea to first degree burglary (see, Penal Law § 140.30 [3]). The record establishes that there was a sufficient factual basis for the plea and that there was no reason for the court to inquire about a possible intoxication defense. Defendant’s sentence is not excessive. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J. — Burglary, 1st Degree.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Green, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 A.D.2d 1026, 579 N.Y.S.2d 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-hale-nyappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack