People v. Gonzales
388 P.3d 819, 213 Cal. Rptr. 3d 590
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Gonzales. Read the opinion of the Court — 216 Cal. Rptr. 3d 285 →
Opinion
Review is ordered on the court's own motion. The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: Is Penal Code section 473, subdivision (b), as amended by Proposition 47, ambiguous as to the manner in which the "identity theft exception" applies? If so, do the voter materials make clear that the identity theft conviction must be transactionally related to the forgery count(s) in order to exclude forgery from misdemeanor treatment under section 473, subdivision (b) ?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Gonzales, 388 P.3d 819, 213 Cal. Rptr. 3d 590 (Cal. 2017).
388 P.3d 819 (People v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.