People v. Gonzales

California Supreme Court

People v. Gonzales

388 P.3d 819, 213 Cal. Rptr. 3d 590

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 15, 2017

DocketS240044

StatusPublished

This text of 388 P.3d 819 (People v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Gonzales, 388 P.3d 819, 213 Cal. Rptr. 3d 590 (Cal. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Review is ordered on the court's own motion. The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: Is Penal Code section 473, subdivision (b), as amended by Proposition 47, ambiguous as to the manner in which the "identity theft exception" applies? If so, do the voter materials make clear that the identity theft conviction must be transactionally related to the forgery count(s) in order to exclude forgery from misdemeanor treatment under section 473, subdivision (b) ?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Review is ordered on the court's own motion. The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: Is Penal Code section 473, subdivision (b), as amended by Proposition 47, ambiguous as to the manner in which the "identity theft exception" applies? If so, do the voter materials make clear that the identity theft conviction must be transactionally related to the forgery count(s) in order to exclude forgery from misdemeanor treatment under section 473, subdivision (b) ?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

388 P.3d 819, 213 Cal. Rptr. 3d 590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gonzales-cal-2017.