People v. Gomez

2023 NY Slip Op 02832
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 25, 2023
DocketInd No. 1916/18 Appeal No. 313 Case No. 2020-02156
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2023 NY Slip Op 02832 (People v. Gomez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Gomez, 2023 NY Slip Op 02832 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

People v Gomez (2023 NY Slip Op 02832)
People v Gomez
2023 NY Slip Op 02832
Decided on May 25, 2023
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: May 25, 2023
Before: Kapnick, J.P., Friedman, Gesmer, Mendez, Pitt-Burke, JJ.

Ind No. 1916/18 Appeal No. 313 Case No. 2020-02156

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Angel Gomez, Defendant-Appellant.


Twyla Carter, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Danielle A. Bernstein of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Noah J. Sexton of counsel), for respondent.



Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Marsha D. Michael, J. at plea; Guy H. Mitchell, J. at sentencing), rendered February 25, 2020, convicting defendant of assault in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 3½ years, with 4 years' postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 559-560 [2019], cert denied 589 US —-, 140 S Ct 2634 [2020]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]), which forecloses review of his claim that his sentence was excessive, and also "precludes review of his argument that the mandatory surcharge and fees imposed at sentencing should be vacated pursuant to CPL 420.35(2-a)" (People v Santiago, 208 AD3d 1112, 1113 [1st Dept 2022], lv denied 39 NY3d 1080 [2023]; see also People v Jones, 208 AD3d 1135 [1st Dept 2022], lv denied 39 NY3d 986 [2022]).

In any event, we find no basis to reduce the term of postrelease supervision, or to vacate the surcharge and fees in the interest of justice.THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: May 25, 2023



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Gomez
2023 NY Slip Op 02832 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2023 NY Slip Op 02832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gomez-nyappdiv-2023.