People v. Gomez

26 A.D.3d 280, 808 N.Y.S.2d 901
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Gomez. Read the opinion of the Court — 16 A.D.3d 280

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered August 4, 2004, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a persistent violent felony offender, to a term of 16 years to life, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s constitutional challenge to the procedure under which he was sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit (see People v Rosen, 96 NY2d 329 [2001], cert denied 534 US 899 [2001]). Defendant’s mandatory sentence as a persistent violent felony offender was triggered solely by his prior convictions (see Almendarez-Torres v United States, 523 US 224 [1998]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Williams and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gomez, 26 A.D.3d 280, 808 N.Y.S.2d 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

26 A.D.3d 280 (People v. Gomez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Almendarez-Torres v. United States
523 U.S. 224 (Supreme Court, 1998)
People v. Rosen
752 N.E.2d 844 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)