People v. Goforth
This text of 122 A.D.3d 1310 (People v. Goforth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the Wyoming County Court (Mark H. Dadd, J.), rendered June 10, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the third degree.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of assault in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.00 [1]). By pleading guilty, defendant forfeited his contention that County Court should have dismissed the indictment because the prosecutor failed to introduce exculpatory evidence before the grand jury (see People v Crumpler, 70 AD3d 1396, 1397 [2010], lv denied 14 NY3d 839 [2010]). Defendant’s further contention that he was denied effective assistance of counsel “does not survive his plea of guilty inasmuch as ‘[t]here is no showing that the plea bargaining process was infected by any allegedly ineffective assistance or that defendant entered the plea because of his attorney[’s] allegedly poor performance’ ” (People v Fomby, 42 AD3d 894, 895 [2007]; see People v Jackson, 99 AD3d 1240, 1240 [2012], lv denied 20 NY3d 987 [2012]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
122 A.D.3d 1310, 995 N.Y.S.2d 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-goforth-nyappdiv-2014.