People v. Glumb

20 Mich. App. 272
Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided November 26, 1969·No. Dockt No. 5,823·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant and a confederate, Doreen Carlisle, were convicted by a jury of larceny [273] in a building.* The only question on appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict.

The sole witness, an experienced security officer for Montgomery Ward, testified that she saw Doreen Carlisle pick up two boxes of Christmas lights and hand them to the defendant who put them in a large shopping bag. The witness testified further that she saw the defendant and Miss Carlisle, who carried the shopping bag, pass two cash registers and walk out of the store together without paying for the Christmas lights.

It is our opinion that the record contains sufficient evidence from which the jury could find the defendant’s guilt established beyond a reasonable doubt. People v. Mays (1969), 19 Mich App 588; People v. Moss (1969), 16 Mich App 295.

Affirmed.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Glumb, 20 Mich. App. 272 (Mich. Ct. App. 1969).

20 Mich. App. 272 (People v. Glumb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Glumb
174 N.W.2d 83 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1969)