People v. Glover

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Glover

63 A.D.2d 597, 404 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11435

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 11, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 63 A.D.2d 597 (People v. Glover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Glover, 63 A.D.2d 597, 404 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11435 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered February 23, 1976, convicting defendant of robbery in the first degree, rape in the first degree and unlawful imprisonment in the second degree and sentencing him to two indeterminate terms of three to nine years and a term of one year to run concurrently, unanimously affirmed. Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered August 13, 1975, dismissing defendant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We affirm but would note that the prosecutor carried his rhetoric to excess during summation, in terms of both a lawyer’s obligation to avoid comment on facts dehors the record and the respect he owes to the court and its rulings. However, after a review of the record, we conclude that these abuses do not warrant reversal. Concur—Evans, J. P., Markewich, Lynch, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered February 23, 1976, convicting defendant of robbery in the first degree, rape in the first degree and unlawful imprisonment in the second degree and sentencing him to two indeterminate terms of three to nine years and a term of one year to run concurrently, unanimously affirmed. Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered August 13, 1975, dismissing defendant’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We affirm but would note that the prosecutor carried his rhetoric to excess during summation, in terms of both a lawyer’s obligation to avoid comment on facts dehors the record and the respect he owes to the court and its rulings. However, after a review of the record, we conclude that these abuses do not warrant reversal. Concur—Evans, J. P., Markewich, Lynch, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 A.D.2d 597, 404 N.Y.S.2d 984, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-glover-nyappdiv-1978.