People v. Glover

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Glover

54 A.D.2d 627, 387 N.Y.S.2d 431, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14112

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 7, 1976

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 54 A.D.2d 627 (People v. Glover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Glover, 54 A.D.2d 627, 387 N.Y.S.2d 431, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered February 26, 1974, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of the crimes of robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the third degree, assault in the second degree, and possession of a weapon as a misdemeanor, and imposing concurrent sentences thereon, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of deleting therefrom the conviction for grand larceny in the third degree and possession of a weapon, vacating the concurrent sentences thereon, and dismissing those counts of the indictment. As so modified, the judgment is affirmed. Inasmuch as defendant was convicted of robbery in the first degree, the conviction for grand larceny in the third degree and possession of a weapon, under the facts herein, must be reversed and said counts dismissed as inclusory concurrent counts. (People v Grier, 37 NY2d 847; People v Pyles, 44 AD2d 784.) We have examined the other points urged by appellant and find them without merit. Concur&emdash;Murphy, J. P., Birns, Silverman, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered February 26, 1974, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of the crimes of robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the third degree, assault in the second degree, and possession of a weapon as a misdemeanor, and imposing concurrent sentences thereon, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of deleting therefrom the conviction for grand larceny in the third degree and possession of a weapon, vacating the concurrent sentences thereon, and dismissing those counts of the indictment. As so modified, the judgment is affirmed. Inasmuch as defendant was convicted of robbery in the first degree, the conviction for grand larceny in the third degree and possession of a weapon, under the facts herein, must be reversed and said counts dismissed as inclusory concurrent counts. (People v Grier, 37 NY2d 847; People v Pyles, 44 AD2d 784.) We have examined the other points urged by appellant and find them without merit. Concur&emdash;Murphy, J. P., Birns, Silverman, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 627, 387 N.Y.S.2d 431, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-glover-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack