People v. Glover

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Glover

719 N.E.2d 910, 93 N.Y.2d 1010, 697 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 2105

New York Court of Appeals·Decided August 26, 1999·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, and a new trial ordered.

The record is insufficient to establish a “ ‘substantial probability’ that the officer’s safety would be jeopardized” by the presence of defendant’s brother and sister in the courtroom (People v Nieves, 90 NY2d 426, 431).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, and a new trial ordered.

The record is insufficient to establish a “ ‘substantial probability’ that the officer’s safety would be jeopardized” by the presence of defendant’s brother and sister in the courtroom (People v Nieves, 90 NY2d 426, 431).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order reversed, etc.

People v. Glover, 719 N.E.2d 910, 93 N.Y.2d 1010, 697 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 2105 (N.Y. 1999).

Pincite

719 N.E.2d 910 (People v. Glover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related