Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Glasco

People v. Glasco

225 A.D.2d 561, 639 N.Y.2d 723, 639 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1825
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 4, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 225 A.D.2d 561 (People v. Glasco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Glasco, 225 A.D.2d 561, 639 N.Y.2d 723, 639 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1825 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of rape in the first degree and sexual abuse in the first degree beyond a reasonable doubt (see, Penal Law § 130.35 [3]; § 130.65 [3]; People v Hobot, 200 AD2d 586, affd 84 NY2d 1021; People v Crandall, 53 AD2d 956, affd 45 NY2d 851). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant was afforded meaningful representation of counsel (see, People v Hobot, supra, 84 NY2d 1021).

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Tardbania, 72 NY2d 852; People v Hoke, 62 NY2d 1022) and we decline to reach them in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see, CPL 470.15 [6]). Balletta, J. P., Joy, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Hobot
646 N.E.2d 1102 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Crandall
382 N.E.2d 766 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Hoke
468 N.E.2d 677 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Tardbania
528 N.E.2d 507 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)
People v. Crandall
53 A.D.2d 956 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Hobot
200 A.D.2d 586 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
225 A.D.2d 561, 639 N.Y.2d 723, 639 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1825, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-glasco-nyappdiv-1996.