People v. Garcia

2017 NY Slip Op 1884, 148 A.D.3d 928, 48 N.Y.S.3d 609
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 2017·No. 2012-09412·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Chin-Brandt, J.), imposed November 9, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 265 [2011]; People v Rennick, 123 AD3d 1146 [2014]; People v Reyes, 121 AD3d 820 *929 [2014]; People v Coleman, 116 AD3d 708 [2014]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Hall, Cohen, LaSalle and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Garcia, 2017 NY Slip Op 1884, 148 A.D.3d 928, 48 N.Y.S.3d 609 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 1884 (People v. Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Garcia
29 N.Y.3d 1031 (New York Court of Appeals, 2017)